Netherlands exposure#
This page summarises the exposure model for Netherlands in Europe, including national, subnational, and taxonomy-level views.
National summary#
The national exposure profile by occupancy class highlights the distribution of buildings, replacement value, and exposed population.
| BUILDINGS | POPULATION | TOTAL_COST | BUILDINGS_% | POPULATION_% | TOTAL_COST_% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCCUPANCY | ||||||
| COM | 284.1K | 0.0M | $393.6B | 4.99% | 0.00% | 12.67% |
| IND | 137.9K | 0.0M | $535.3B | 2.42% | 0.00% | 17.23% |
| RES | 5,275.4K | 18.3M | $2,176.8B | 92.59% | 100.00% | 70.09% |
Figure: Relative contribution of occupancy classes to total national exposure in Netherlands.
Figure: National exposure distribution by taxonomy classes in Netherlands.
Figure: Building height profile used in the exposure model for Netherlands.
Subnational summary#
The subnational summary aggregates exposure by first administrative level and supports comparison of spatial concentration of assets.
| BUILDINGS | POPULATION | TOTAL_COST | BUILDINGS_% | POPULATION_% | TOTAL_COST_% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAME_1 | ||||||
| Zuid-Holland | 953.1K | 3,996.5K | $604.0B | 16.73% | 21.78% | 19.45% |
| Noord-Holland | 781.1K | 3,062.9K | $494.3B | 13.71% | 16.69% | 15.92% |
| Noord-Brabant | 945.2K | 2,715.3K | $475.9B | 16.59% | 14.80% | 15.32% |
| Gelderland | 751.0K | 2,197.9K | $377.3B | 13.18% | 11.98% | 12.15% |
| Utrecht | 404.6K | 1,411.2K | $223.3B | 7.10% | 7.69% | 7.19% |
| Limburg | 433.9K | 1,122.4K | $221.4B | 7.62% | 6.12% | 7.13% |
| Overijssel | 424.7K | 1,209.0K | $213.4B | 7.45% | 6.59% | 6.87% |
| Fryslân | 274.2K | 669.4K | $132.3B | 4.81% | 3.65% | 4.26% |
| Groningen | 211.5K | 596.1K | $117.4B | 3.71% | 3.25% | 3.78% |
| Drenthe | 200.4K | 515.5K | $92.0B | 3.52% | 2.81% | 2.96% |
| Zeeland | 170.1K | 392.7K | $85.8B | 2.98% | 2.14% | 2.76% |
| Flevoland | 147.7K | 457.8K | $68.5B | 2.59% | 2.50% | 2.21% |
Figure: Subnational distribution of exposure by occupancy class across first-level administrative units.
Figure: Subnational distribution of exposure by taxonomy classes across first-level administrative units.
Taxonomy summary#
The taxonomy summary provides a detailed view of building classes represented in the national exposure model.
Figure: Distribution of exposure by detailed taxonomy classes in Netherlands.
| BUILDINGS | POPULATION | TOTAL_COST | BUILDINGS_% | POPULATION_% | TOTAL_COST_% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MACRO_TAXONOMY | TAXONOMY | OCCUPANCY | ||||||
| MUR | MUR/LWAL/CDN+ERN/H:1/RES | RES | 2,533.5K | 5,908.4K | $822.7B | 44.47% | 32.20% | 26.49% |
| MUR/LWAL/CDN+ERN/H:2/RES | RES | 2,156.1K | 5,025.0K | $538.8B | 37.84% | 27.39% | 17.35% | |
| S | S/LFBR/CDN+ERL/H:1/IND | IND | 81.3K | 0.0K | $312.1B | 1.43% | 0.00% | 10.05% |
| CR- | CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:3-5/RES | RES | 82.4K | 2,240.4K | $257.4B | 1.45% | 12.21% | 8.29% |
| CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:>5/RES | RES | 29.1K | 2,134.6K | $199.8B | 0.51% | 11.63% | 6.43% | |
| CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:3-5/RES | RES | 51.0K | 1,381.9K | $157.4B | 0.90% | 7.53% | 5.07% | |
| HYB | HYB(W;S)/LPB/CDN+ERN/H:1/IND | IND | 16.2K | 0.0K | $88.8B | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.86% |
| CR- | CR/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:2/IND | IND | 23.1K | 0.0K | $76.8B | 0.40% | 0.00% | 2.47% |
| CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:2/RES | RES | 274.3K | 644.8K | $71.3B | 4.81% | 3.51% | 2.30% | |
| CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:3-5/COM | COM | 26.5K | 0.0K | $54.0B | 0.47% | 0.00% | 1.74% | |
| CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:>5/RES | RES | 7.8K | 560.7K | $53.6B | 0.14% | 3.06% | 1.72% | |
| MUR | MUR/LWAL/CDN+ERN/H:2/COM | COM | 36.8K | 0.0K | $45.2B | 0.65% | 0.00% | 1.45% |
| MUR/LWAL/CDN+ERN/H:1/COM | COM | 62.4K | 0.0K | $42.2B | 1.10% | 0.00% | 1.36% | |
| CR- | CR/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:3-5/COM | COM | 18.1K | 0.0K | $36.9B | 0.32% | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| W | W/LWAL/CDN+ERM/H:1/RES | RES | 68.1K | 160.0K | $34.1B | 1.20% | 0.87% | 1.10% |
| CR- | CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:1/IND | IND | 8.6K | 0.0K | $28.8B | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.93% |
| CR+PC/LPB/CDN+ERL/H:1/IND | IND | 8.6K | 0.0K | $28.8B | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.93% | |
| S | S/LFBR/CDN+ERL/H:3-5/COM | COM | 12.9K | 0.0K | $26.9B | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| S/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:3-5/COM | COM | 12.9K | 0.0K | $26.9B | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.87% | |
| W | W/LWAL/CDN+ERM/H:2/RES | RES | 68.1K | 160.0K | $26.3B | 1.20% | 0.87% | 0.85% |
| CR- | CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:3-5/COM | COM | 9.8K | 0.0K | $19.9B | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.64% |
| S | S/LFBR/CDN+ERL/H:>5/COM | COM | 7.0K | 0.0K | $19.2B | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| S/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:>5/COM | COM | 7.0K | 0.0K | $19.2B | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.62% | |
| MUR | MUR/LWAL/CDN+ERN/H:3-5/RES | RES | 4.9K | 130.9K | $15.5B | 0.09% | 0.71% | 0.50% |
| S | S/LFBR/CDN+ERL/H:1/COM | COM | 14.6K | 0.0K | $11.4B | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.37% |
| S/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:1/COM | COM | 14.6K | 0.0K | $11.4B | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.37% | |
| CR- | CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:1/COM | COM | 14.2K | 0.0K | $10.6B | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:2/COM | COM | 7.1K | 0.0K | $10.0B | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.32% | |
| S | S/LFBR/CDN+ERL/H:2/COM | COM | 6.3K | 0.0K | $9.8B | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.32% |
| S/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:2/COM | COM | 6.3K | 0.0K | $9.8B | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.32% | |
| CR- | CR/LWAL/CDL+ERL/H:>5/COM | COM | 2.3K | 0.0K | $8.6B | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:1/COM | COM | 9.3K | 0.0K | $7.1B | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.23% | |
| CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:2/COM | COM | 4.3K | 0.0K | $6.4B | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.21% | |
| CR/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:>5/COM | COM | 1.5K | 0.0K | $5.8B | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.19% | |
| CR/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:1/COM | COM | 6.3K | 0.0K | $4.6B | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.15% | |
| CR/LFM/CDN+ERL/H:2/COM | COM | 3.2K | 0.0K | $4.4B | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.14% | |
| CR+PC/LWAL/CDN+ERL/H:>5/COM | COM | 0.9K | 0.0K | $3.2B | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.10% |