Uncertainty signatures#
NB: new in version 3.27
In the OpenQuake engine the epistemic uncertainties are applied to the sources one set of realizations at a time; realizations having the same uncertainties for a given source are identified by a so-called uncertainty signature.
In particular for classical calculations there is a global RateMap, i.e. an array of float32 numbers of shape (N, L, Gt), where N is the total number of hazard sites, L the total number of intensity measure levels and Gt is the total number of uncertainty signatures summed over all the tectonic region types:
Gt = Σ_i G(trt_i)
``Gt`` is also called the *core size* of the logic tree.
Note
Since many realizations have the same uncertainties, the core size is typically much smaller than the number R of realizations of the logic tree: in the demo described below there are 324 realizations but only 36 uncertainty signatures, i.e. 9 times less data than one would store naively. This is what makes it possible to run large logic trees; see Large Calculations.
The global RateMap is usually not kept in memory: it
is materialized in the master node only when the rates must be accumulated
there, i.e. when there are few sites, or when disagg_by_src is
set, or when the sources of a group are split in blocks. It is still
a useful concept, since the rates stored in the datastore are enough
to reconstruct it and from the global RateMap one can rebuild the
full hazard curves for all realizations (the engine does that in
postclassical by splitting in blocks of sites so that it does
not need to keep the full RateMap in memory).
Since the signatures are fully determined by the logic tree and by the
source model, they are computed while building the CompositeSourceModel,
i.e. before the preclassical, and stored in the datastore in the
unc_signatures dataset; the core size is logged at the same time,
together with the size in bytes of the global RateMap.
The concept of uncertainty signatures is relevant only if your logic
tree contains applyToSources or applyToBranches, i.e. only if some
uncertainties are applied to a subset of the sources. If all the
uncertainties are applied to all the sources, each source has a single
signature covering all its realizations and there is nothing to sign.
In that case (the trivial case) Gt can be computed trivially as
the sum of the number of GSIMs for each tectonic region type:
Gt = Σ_i num_gsims(trt_i)
In the nontrivial case the engine can determine the signatures and the core size without
running a full calculation; just run the command oq check_input job.ini and they will
be printed at the end; they can be also inspected in any calculation with
the command oq show usignatures.
NB: for branchsets with parameters the values column contains a
tuple per distinct value, i.e. the fields of the value; since the field
names are the same for all the values of a branchset they are not
repeated, i.e. (0.8, 3.25, 0.371113), (0.8, 3.25, 0.29666); this is
how the table can stay readable for models with many sources and
branchsets.
An example with applyToSources#
The demo LogicTreeCase2ClassicalPSHA has a sourceModel branchset
and four uncertainty branchsets, abGRAbsolute and
maxMagGRAbsolute applied to the first and to the second source, each
with three branches:
sourceModel(1) x abGRAbsolute first(3) x maxMagGRAbsolute first(3)
x abGRAbsolute second(3) x maxMagGRAbsolute second(3)
= 81 source model paths
and the check gives:
Core size Gt=36 out of R=324 realizations
Global RateMap of 2.67 KB for 1 sites and 19 levels
...
Uncertainty signatures of calc_172129
| source_id | num_rlzs | branchset | values |
|-----------+---------------------------+-----------+------------------------------------|
| first | 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 | bs2 | (4.6, 1.1), (4.5, 1.0), (4.4, 0.9) |
| | | bs4 | 7.0, 7.3, 7.6 |
| second | 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 | bs3 | (3.3, 1.0), (3.2, 0.9), (3.1, 0.8) |
| | | bs5 | 7.5, 7.8, 8.0 |
Only bs2 and bs4 apply to the area source first and only
bs3 and bs5 apply to the fault source second, therefore each
source has 3 x 3 = 9 signatures; each source is in the 81 source model
realizations (the GMM logic tree has 4 branches, so R = 81 x 4 = 324),
hence each signature covers 9 realizations, i.e. the ones differing
only in the uncertainties of the other source. In total there are 18
realization sets, 9 per source, so that with two GMMs per tectonic
region type Gt = 18 x 2 = 36, i.e. the 324 realizations of the logic
tree are reduced to 36 columns of the global RateMap.
Since the core size Gt determines the size of the global RateMap, the signatures are also a way to understand why a calculation is large; see Large Calculations.
An example with applyToBranches#
Consider the test case logictree/case_12, with a sourceModel
branchset with two branches (fault_background and
smooth_collapsed), a bGRRelative branchset with three branches and
applyToBranches="smooth_collapsed" and a maxMagGRRelative
branchset with three branches.
You can extract the information about the logic tree with the command
oq info job.ini, which lists the branchsets with their filters and
plots the tree of branches:
$ oq info openquake/qa_tests_data/logictree/case_12/job.ini
calculation_mode: classical
description: 2018 PSHA model - North Africa
site parameters: vs30
input size: 7.47 KB
<sourceModel(2)>
<bGRRelative(3, applyToBranches=smooth_collapsed)>
<maxMagGRRelative(3)>
└── sm1
├── fault_background
│ └── fault_background
│ ├── m_m0.2
│ ├── m_e0.0
│ └── m_p0.2
└── smooth_collapsed
├── b_m0.05
│ ├── m_m0.2
│ ├── m_e0.0
│ └── m_p0.2
<snip>
└── b_p0.05
├── m_m0.2
├── m_e0.0
└── m_p0.2
The plot shows at a glance that the branchset bval appears only inside
the smooth_collapsed sector of the tree, while the fault_background
branch has only the three branches of mmax.
The signatures are printed by the check command:
$ oq check_input openquake/qa_tests_data/logictree/case_12/job.ini
...
Building 12 realizations
...
Core size Gt=10 out of R=12 realizations
Global RateMap of 400 B for 1 sites and 10 levels
...
Uncertainty signatures of calc_172128
| source_id | num_rlzs | branchset | values |
|-----------+---------------------------+-----------+------------------------------------|
| first | 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 | bs2 | (4.6, 1.1), (4.5, 1.0), (4.4, 0.9) |
| | | bs4 | 7.0, 7.3, 7.6 |
| second | 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9 | bs3 | (3.3, 1.0), (3.2, 0.9), (3.1, 0.8) |
| | | bs5 | 7.5, 7.8, 8.0 |
There is a row for each pair (source, branchset), since a signature is a
combination of values of branchsets, and a row with - for the sources
with no uncertainties at all. The source_id and the num_rlzs
column are printed only on the first row of each source, so that the
rows belonging to the same source are visually grouped.
The source BG_10 is in the fault_background source model, to which
the branchset bval does not apply, so it has a single signature
covering its 3 realizations; the source SC_10:124 is in the
smooth_collapsed model, to which both bval and mmax apply, so
it has 3 x 3 = 9 signatures with one realization each.
The core size Gt=10 of the global RateMap can be read directly from
the table: BG_10 contributes a single index of rate attribution (its
only signature covers the 3 realizations) and SC_10:124 contributes
9, for a total of 1 + 9 = 10; since the GMM logic tree of the case has a
single GMM there is one column per index of rate attribution, i.e.:
Gt = (1 + 9) x G(trt) = 10 x 1 = 10 with R = 12 realizations
i.e. Gt is smaller than R because the 3 realizations of the
fault_background model have the same (empty) signature, so they have
the same rates and share a single column.
NB: even though mmax has no filters, it is not applied to BG_10
either, since a branchset following a branchset with filters applies only
within the same sector of the logic tree, i.e. to the branches selected by
the filters.
The num_rlzs column contains the number of realizations in
each realization set of the source, i.e. in each set of realizations
with the same uncertainties, in ascending order: 1, 1, 1 means
three realization sets with one realization each, while 3 means a
single realization set covering 3 realizations; summing them gives the
total number of realizations of the source and counting them gives its
number of signatures. As long as there are at most 10 realization sets
the values are listed one by one, otherwise the repeated ones are
replaced by their multiplicity, i.e. 1 (x81 sets). This is particularly
relevant for correlated uncertainties, where the sources of a group can
have different signatures and a realization can belong to more than one
realization set: see Correlated uncertainties.